Exit Mode · Editorial
What 2020 taught founders about distressed M&A
COVID turned 2020 into a stress test for exits. The deals that still closed show what distressed M&A taught founders about liquidity, speed and buyer behaviour. ~11 min read.
On 6 March 2020, WPX Energy acquires Felix Energy Holdings II, LLC was announced. A month later, Asta Finance Acquisition acquires Asta Funding was signed as an all-cash take-private. By late May, Via Varejo acquires Carrier EQ showed that cross-border buyers were still willing to move, even in the middle of a global freeze. That sequence matters because it cuts against the lazy version of 2020. The year was not defined by buyers disappearing. It was defined by buyers getting selective, fast and brutally clear about what they wanted.
Exit Mode's view is that 2020 was a stress test for founder optionality. If a company entered the year with enough liquidity to choose its buyer, it could still negotiate structure. If it entered the year weak, the market moved from valuation to solvency in a matter of weeks. The deals that got done were not random. They clustered around two ideas: strategic buyers taking control of assets they understood, and consolidators using the panic to secure scale. The lesson was not that distressed periods kill M&A. The lesson was that distressed periods compress time, narrow the buyer pool and make certainty more valuable than storytelling.
Speed became a pricing advantage
The first pattern in 2020 was speed. WPX Energy acquires Felix Energy Holdings II, LLC used a cash-and-shares structure, which the commentary frames as a buyer preserving liquidity while still moving on a major asset. Asta Finance Acquisition acquires Asta Funding went cleaner, using pure cash in April. Via Varejo acquires Carrier EQ added a cross-border wrinkle, but the same logic held: conviction mattered more than perfect conditions.
That matters for founders because dislocated markets reward prepared buyers, not patient sellers. In a normal cycle, running a longer process can bring in more bidders and improve terms. In a stressed cycle, delay often works in the opposite direction. The buyer that already understands the asset, has financing lined up and can live with imperfect visibility gets the advantage. That is why 2020 rewarded readiness on both sides of the table. The seller needed clean materials, clean governance and a short path to diligence. The buyer needed the nerve to underwrite uncertainty faster than everyone else.
Distress did not attract tourists
The second pattern is more important. 2020 did not produce a market full of random bargain hunters. It produced a market where strategic buyers paid for assets they already knew how to use. Ligand Pharmaceuticals acquires Pfenex mixed cash with an earn-out, a classic sign that the buyer wanted control but still priced future performance risk tightly. McKean Defense Group acquires Mikros Systems used all cash to take a defence asset private. FR Utility Services acquires The Goldfield Corporation did the same at the end of the year.
The common feature was not opportunism in the abstract. It was specificity. These buyers were not buying a recovery trade. They were buying assets that fit an existing operating model. That is why "fire sale" is usually the wrong mental model for founders. In real distressed M&A, the winning bidders are often the most strategic buyers in the room, because they can justify a price that a financial tourist cannot. They know how the target folds into their own plan, which lets them move faster and with more certainty when the market is shaky.
Structure shifted with the seller's leverage
A third lesson from 2020 is that structure told the truth even when headlines did not. Cott Corporation acquires Primo Water used a mix of cash and shares. Via Varejo acquires CarrierEQ d/b/a Airfox also used a mixed structure and sat at firm intention rather than completion. Ligand Pharmaceuticals acquires Pfenex added an earn-out. None of that is cosmetic. Each structure shows how risk was being pushed around the table.
When markets are stable, mixed consideration can be framed as alignment. In a stressed market, mixed consideration often means the buyer is protecting downside and the seller has fewer alternatives. Shares preserve buyer cash. Earn-outs defer the argument about value into the post-close period. Deferred certainty is still uncertainty. Founders should read these terms as signals about bargaining power. In 2020, the companies with the weakest outside options did not only take lower prices. They also accepted more conditional paths to getting paid.
Scale logic survived the panic
The final pattern is that consolidation did not stop. It narrowed into sectors where scale looked like survival. WPX Energy acquires Felix Energy Holdings II, LLC fit an energy consolidation logic. Cott Corporation acquires Primo Water showed consumer and distribution logic still working. Via Varejo acquires Carrier EQ showed that even a difficult year could still reward buyers looking to add capability rather than just cut cost.
That is the part founders often miss when the market turns ugly. Buyers do not stop thinking strategically. They just stop funding vague narratives. If the target clearly improves distribution, product depth, customer access or public-to-private operating freedom, deals can still happen. If the pitch depends on a hot market multiple or a long list of future possibilities, it usually dies first.
The pattern
These 2020 deals had one thing in common: they priced certainty above hope. The buyers who won were buyers with a reason, not just buyers with cash. The sellers who still had leverage kept more cash at close and cleaner structures. The sellers under pressure gave up more on timing, structure or both. Distressed M&A is not a separate category of market. It is ordinary M&A with the luxury removed.
Founder's Lens
Adam J. Graham's read on this year: I still think 2020 taught founders the most useful lesson of the past decade. When the market breaks, the spreadsheet story you told yourself about valuation stops mattering for a while. Cash runway, buyer readiness and speed start mattering more than the top-line number. Looking back from 2026, the founders who came through that year best were not always the ones with the strongest businesses on paper. They were the ones who had options early, cleaned up their materials before they were desperate and knew which strategic buyers actually had a reason to act.
What it means today
The 2020 lesson still applies in 2026. If markets wobble, founders should not assume the exit window has vanished. They should assume the bar for certainty has gone up. That means more work on buyer mapping, more discipline on runway and less attachment to a valuation that only existed in a stronger market. For the thin but useful archive of the deals that still got done, start with the 2020 archive.

